Stories

ஜெம் வீரமணி பாலியல் வழக்கு
N
News18•29-09-2026, 13:37
Gem Veeramani Case: DMK Files New Petition to Investigate CM, Ministers!
  • •DMK Treasurer T.R. Baalu has filed a petition in the Chennai High Court, requesting the SIT to summon and investigate Chief Minister Vijay and Ministers Aadav Arjuna and C.T.R. Nirmal Kumar in the Gem Veeramani sexual assault case.
  • •CM Vijay alleged DMK protected Gem Veeramani, while Ministers Arjuna and Nirmal Kumar claimed mishandling of the case and receipt of 500 crore rupees by DMK.
  • •T.R. Baalu's petition states that since these allegations are directly related to the SIT's investigation, the SIT should be ordered to inquire into them to obtain underlying evidence and information.
  • •The petition seeks answers to questions like whether there are proofs for the allegations, why they haven't been submitted to investigators, and if confidential documents were leaked.
  • •It emphasizes immediate collection of evidence to prevent destruction and calls for action under the POCSO Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita against those making false allegations or leaking investigation secrets.

Key Questions Answered

DMK Treasurer and Lok Sabha Group Leader T.R. Baalu filed a petition in the Chennai High Court asking the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to summon and investigate Chief Minister Vijay along with Ministers Aadav Arjuna and C.T.R. Nirmal Kumar over their public allegations that the DMK protected the accused in the Gem Veeramani POCSO case.

Chief Minister Vijay alleged that the DMK protected Gem Veeramani in the POCSO case, while Minister Aadav Arjuna claimed the party mishandled the case. Furthermore, Law Minister Nirmal Kumar accused the DMK of receiving 500 crore rupees from Gem Veeramani to protect him.

The DMK petition demands answers regarding whether any proofs exist for the allegations made by the Chief Minister and ministers, why they haven't been submitted to investigating officers, whether confidential documents were obtained without authorization, and if investigation secrets were leaked to the public.