Stories
Life-Cycle Funds vs DIY Portfolios: Which is Better for Your 30-Year Investment Goal?
M
Moneycontrol•09-10-2026, 17:17
Life-Cycle Funds vs DIY Portfolios: Which is Better for Your 30-Year Investment Goal?
- •SEBI has formally recognized life-cycle funds as a mutual fund category, drawing increased attention to automated asset allocation strategies.
- •Life-cycle funds feature a glide path that automatically shifts investments from growth-heavy equities to defensive assets like debt, gold, or silver as the target date approaches.
- •A do-it-yourself (DIY) portfolio offers investors complete control over asset selection, rebalancing frequency, and the pace of de-risking, but requires active management.
- •Life-cycle funds suit investors who prefer simplicity and a hands-off approach through a single systematic investment plan (SIP).
- •The ideal choice depends on whether an investor values hands-off automation or prefers custom control and flexibility over a 30-year horizon.
Key Questions Answered
A life-cycle fund starts with a higher allocation to growth assets and gradually shifts towards debt and other defensive assets as the target date approaches. The fund manager determines the exact mix within prescribed bands, and gold or silver ETFs can also be part of the permitted allocation.
A DIY portfolio offers investors greater control over asset selection, allocation, and the pace of de-risking. It also allows for adjustments if financial goals change or if retirement is postponed, without being tied to a fixed maturity date.
SEBI has formally recognized life-cycle funds as a mutual fund category, which brings more attention and structure to this investment approach.
